Here's something to think about slowly: the Slow Bicycle Movement.
You're probably heard about Slow Food (the opposite of fast food, you actually get to sit back and relax while you're eating, it's an "eco-gastronomic member-supported organization that was founded in 1989 to counteract fast food and fast life, the disappearance of local food traditions and people’s dwindling interest in the food they eat, where it comes from, how it tastes and how our food choices affect the rest of the world")
Then there's the Slow Planet website, which has interesting ideas about Slow Design ("using materials and resources in a way that respects the environment...[and] small-scale, local production and networks of artisans sharing
ideas and expertise;) Slow Travel (don't rush from place to place wondering if it's Tuesday and whether you're in Belgium;) and Slow Sport (this one I can't get into since it eulogizes golf, which is not a sport in my book.)
The slow bicycle movement is exactly what I adhere to when i cycle (as opposed to the Spandex Speeders who scream around and sow terror in the hearts of little tykes and dogs.)
For one thing, it's considerably safer to cycle slow. You get to watch out for traffic, cars and pedestrians who step off the curb in front of you. If you go slowly enough, you can actually hit that car door that's opened in front of you and not get injured.
Besides which, it uses less energy and you get where you're going to only a few minutes later...of course, I never cycle more than a mile or two.
If you slowly bicycle to work, you wouldn't have to petition your employer for a shower so you can clean yourself up, since you would not have broken a sweat in the first place.
And you wouldn't get your blood pressure up about pedestrians straying onto the bike lane on the Brooklyn bridge since you would just slowly sidle around them.
I have often mentioned that the difference between the way cyclists behave in the US and in Europe is a matter of their motivation. Here we seem to be in a hurry and the bike is a way of getting there and getting exercise at the same time. If you check out the pictures on the Copenhagen blog you would see that there are hundreds if not thousands of people cycling as an everyday activity in Copenhagen. No spandex and no helmets.
I have to disagree with a lot of this article:
>For one thing, it's considerably safer to cycle slow. You get to watch out for traffic,
> cars and pedestrians who step off the curb in front of you. If you go slowly
>enough, you can actually hit that car door that's opened in front of you and not get injured.
>
And if you *DO* get hit, there is a much greater difference in momentum between the car and you.
It would be as if you were hit harder.
Also, if you ride slow, cars get more aggravated by your
presence on the street, and are more likely to do things like cut you off, weave around you in
unsafe ways, etc. From my experience, the closer your speed matches that of traffic, the more
respect you get on the road.
>Besides which, it uses less energy and you get where you're going to only
> a few minutes later...of course, I never cycle more than a mile or two.
>
Well, if you never cycle more than two miles, I have no idea what to say to you.
It's debatable that you use less energy. When you travel slowly, a greater
fraction of your energy output (your legs) is spent overcoming rolling resistance.
The bicycle becomes much less efficient. Also, significantly more energy is put into
things such as balance. This is why it's easier to climb a hill at 12mph than it is at 8mph.
>And you wouldn't get your blood pressure up about pedestrians straying
> onto the bike lane on the Brooklyn bridge since you would just slowly sidle around them.
>
Haha. Even if you ride slowly on the bkln bridge, those pedestrians will still get in your
way in unpredictable and rude ways. And there are so many of them that you *can't* ride
around them; they form a wall of "god bless america" shirts.
>I have often mentioned that the difference between the way cyclists behave in the
>US and in Europe is a matter of their motivation. Here we seem to be in a hurry
>and the bike is a way of getting there and getting exercise at the same time. If
>you check out the pictures on the Copenhagen blog you would see that there are
>hundreds if not thousands of people cycling as an everyday activity in Copenhagen
>No spandex and no helmets.
>
There is more than simply a cultural divide there. There is also the fact that copenhagen
is small and dense, and that there is such a large percentage of the population on bikes
that cars are quite mindful of cyclists. Really, your comparison is not well thought out.
Posted by: nickjohnson | Jul 09, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Well, as you know, I'm completely with you here, Chandru! For us Slow Cyclists, efficiency is really not the point... it's just an enjoyable way to get from one place to the other.
And by the way, children and pets are not the only ones afraid of the Spandex Speeders. They are simply a menace, and this is a cyclist talking! Anyone who feels the need to ride laps on a bicycle at 30mph has no business in Prospect Park.
Posted by: Anne (http://sustainableflatbush.org) | Jul 10, 2008 at 01:33 AM
So it's better to be going fast at the time of an accident so you are closer in relative speed to the other vehicle? Wow. Iae, I was talking about hitting a parked car, and being somewhat facetious to boot.
"Also, if you ride slow, cars get more aggravated by your presence on the street"...common sense should prevail. I was talking about 1) bike lanes or 2) (in the majority of my cycling) on residential streets where cars can easily go around me.
Iae, cycling fast on streets is plain suicidal. Bikes have neither the control not the braking ability to avoid accidents at speeds like 15mph.
And I don't buy your energy calculations. The energy required for propulsion goes up as the square of the speed, and is clearly way beyond the rolling resistance you mention. If you can do 18mph uphill, more power (pun intended) to you. I'll see you later.
Posted by: chandru | Jul 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM
And did you know that the fast food and casual dining restaurants you eat in every day have secret menu items? A select few are in on the secret and now you are a part of this culinary elite. We aren't just talking about the barely secret In-N-Out Burger "hold the bread, lettuce wrapped burger,” oh no. We have items all over town, including an unhealthy smoothie at Jamba Juice and a San Francisco-only Mc10:35. The Consumerist is all over this, and now you can be too!!!
Posted by: sildenafil citrate | Apr 22, 2010 at 07:13 PM
How often does the average American eat fast food per week?
Posted by: buy cialis | Apr 23, 2010 at 04:42 PM
This kind of information is very limited on internet. Nice to find the post related to my searching criteria. Your updated and informative post will be appreciated by blog loving people.
Posted by: research writing | Jul 20, 2010 at 05:44 AM
They are simply a menace, and this is a cyclist talking! Anyone who feels the need to ride laps on a bicycle at 30mph has no business in Prospect Park.
Posted by: NFL Jerseys | Aug 16, 2010 at 10:25 PM
There is clearly a whole lot to understand about this. I think you produced some excellent points in Functions also.
Keep working , terrific career!
Posted by: generic viagra | Dec 31, 2010 at 02:12 AM